Bookmark & share: 
Welcome to reader comments forum, which is offered as
a "public square" for our audience. We view this space as our readers'
section of the Web site, separate from our journalistic offerings.
We hope you will use the forum to advance public dialogue and community
discourse. As such, we ask that participants refrain from personal
attacks and offensive comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate or
offensive, you can bring it to our attention by clicking on the 'report
abuse' link by the comment. It will be reviewed by online staff.
Please understand that 1) a comment is not "inappropriate" solely
because you disagree with its author; and 2) there may be a delay while
the comment is being reviewed.
Please review our Reader Comment Guidelines.
Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First
Scholar
of Augusta, ME
Apr 17, 2008 9:19 AM
Sheesh, another effort by Maine to pave the way on an issue best dealt with at the Federal level. Can you imagine how business-unfriendly it is for mnufacturers and vendors to keep track of and comply with the different requirements of 50 states? And we get to add a new program to the list of Maine state government "services" that will of course add to the cost of state government. To top it all off, the bill exempts some of the worst polluters in the state.report abusetim murphy
of saco, ME
You know the best prevention to children getting harmed by chemicals was called PARENTS.
Will we be taxing kids that have parents next?report abuse
Apr 16, 2008 4:29 PM
so does this mean no bleach, amonia etc?
You know the best prevention to children getting harmed by chemicals was called PARENTS.
Will we be taxing kids that have parents next?report abuse
You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.
