Bookmark & share: 
Welcome to reader comments forum, which is offered as
a "public square" for our audience. We view this space as our readers'
section of the Web site, separate from our journalistic offerings.
We hope you will use the forum to advance public dialogue and community
discourse. As such, we ask that participants refrain from personal
attacks and offensive comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate or
offensive, you can bring it to our attention by clicking on the 'report
abuse' link by the comment. It will be reviewed by online staff.
Please understand that 1) a comment is not "inappropriate" solely
because you disagree with its author; and 2) there may be a delay while
the comment is being reviewed.
Please review our Reader Comment Guidelines.
Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First
pbh4444
of Portland, ME
Of course no person with porn on her computer would read this, but
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encrypting_File_Systemreport abuse
Aug 6, 2008 7:47 PM
The courts have ruled that what is encrypted on your computer cannot be accessed by code breaking.
Of course no person with porn on her computer would read this, but
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encrypting_File_Systemreport abuse
Annie
of Gorham, ME
Aug 6, 2008 7:42 PM
I say we protect as many children as we can, no matter the method.report abuseRick
of Winslow, ME
Aug 6, 2008 7:36 PM
I don't think it's right to make an IT tech repairman responsible for spying on his customers. If he wants to report it, fine, but making it mandatory which would make him/her liable if they DIDN'T report it, isn't right.report abusejames ruhl
of falmouth, ME
Aug 6, 2008 6:26 PM
what is needed is some type of univeral 'code' which when put into a computer brings up child porn. There must be a way to do this, and leave the adult stuff and everything else out. A code...put it in....bring up all child porn. Good idea.report abuseYou must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.
