Bookmark & share: 
Welcome to reader comments forum, which is offered as
a "public square" for our audience. We view this space as our readers'
section of the Web site, separate from our journalistic offerings.
We hope you will use the forum to advance public dialogue and community
discourse. As such, we ask that participants refrain from personal
attacks and offensive comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate or
offensive, you can bring it to our attention by clicking on the 'report
abuse' link by the comment. It will be reviewed by online staff.
Please understand that 1) a comment is not "inappropriate" solely
because you disagree with its author; and 2) there may be a delay while
the comment is being reviewed.
Please review our Reader Comment Guidelines.
Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First
micheal wilber
of wtvl, ME
money was stated,but with grant help this veto may have been a mistake,maybe a new mayor will be for development.
this would have helped the stagnant downtown area
the river front has blight written all over itreport abuse
Oct 22, 2008 3:41 PM
curious why current mayor has postponed the long going development vision
money was stated,but with grant help this veto may have been a mistake,maybe a new mayor will be for development.
this would have helped the stagnant downtown area
the river front has blight written all over itreport abuse
Josh
of Auburn, ME
Joshreport abuse
Oct 22, 2008 1:46 PM
This was poorly written. Makes it sound like the mayor doesn't want to redevelop the riverfront. Maybe in tomorrow's story you can elaborate a bit on the actual difference of opinion and what both parties want.
Joshreport abuse
You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.
